Make your work with people visible in ESG
ESG is not just about climate and CO₂. Social aspects, employees, and responsible leadership are also part of the picture.
TT38 provides you with a concrete tool for development, leadership, and collaboration – and a clearer basis for demonstrating what you actually do.
✓ Free · Easy · No commitment
THE PROBLEM
CO₂ is easier to count
than people
Energy consumption, waste, and emissions fit into a spreadsheet.
It quickly becomes less straightforward when reporting on employee development, leadership, collaboration, and how people function within the organisation.
So how do you actually show that working with people is more than good intentions and a few nice phrases?
THE CONSEQUENCE
The human element quickly
becomes unclear
- Good HR initiatives can be difficult to document concretely
- Leadership and employee development end up as broad statements of intent
- Various initiatives may lack a clear common direction
- It becomes harder to show what the company actually does in practice
Room for the human element
TT38 talents provide insight into strengths, motivation, and work preferences.
In other words, a common starting point that can be used across employee development, leadership, onboarding, teams, and recruitment, among other areas.
And then working with people becomes less abstract.
You get concrete profiles and development initiatives that make it easier to work systematically with employee development, leadership, and collaboration – and to articulate the effort afterwards.
People are already part of ESG
The ESRS standards for own workforce include, among other things, employee development, competencies, and ongoing performance reviews.
This means that working with people is not just a soft HR discipline. It is part of the social area that companies may need to work systematically with and be able to describe.
A talent test is not an ESG report
TT38 makes some of the work behind reporting more tangible: how you develop people, work with leadership, and utilise differences and strengths within the organisation.
After all, it's easier to talk about something you actually work with systematically.